Isotherapy

(Note : if you want more information on this subject, you will find some on the very good book written by Alan V.Schmukler “A complete guide to homeopathy”).

 

Homeopathy is a cure by the “similar” (homeo=similar in Greek). Isotherapy is a cure by the “identical” (iso=identical in Greek).

Homeopathy classifies the different effects of various mineral, vegetal or animal substances and make a remedy out of these substances by diluting them many times. Isotherapy uses the same method as homeopathy but starts with a little piece of material (infected skin, pus, urine, spit…) linked to the disease we want to cure. A preparation is made out of this infected or sick material and is then diluted many times (like in homeopathy).

The same process can also be made with any polluting or toxic external substance (chemical, poison, infected water or food…) that could have been the cause of any poisoning or side effects.

ADVANTAGES OF ISOTHERAPY

1) interesting if you can collect some infected or sick material.

2) can be made easily at home.

3) can replace homeopathic remedies if you don’t have the correct homeopathic substance with you.

DISADVANTAGE :

1) cannot be made with all types of diseases or pains. Headaches or painful backs cannot be cured by this method because you cannot make a link with any material that could be collected.

2) you need a little bit of utensils to make the remedy.

3) you need some time to prepare the remedy and you must add the time for the remedy to bring positive results so it cannot be used when the problem is really urgent.

 

We will now present the steps to realize an isotherapic remedy.

 

A. THE “MOTHER TINCTURE”

1) First, you have to collect (in a clean way) some infected or sick material from your body or from the body of the person you want to cure.

2) Put that material in a little flask (with a tap on top so that you can close easily this flask) and add a mix of alcohol and pure distilled or filtered water. The alcohol should be as pure and white as possible (like vodka for example) and should be at least at 20% of the total volume (the exact alcoholic concentration varies from one method to another).

3) During all this process avoid the proximity of strong odours because isotherapic remedies, like homeopathic ones, don’t like strong odours.

4) wash carefully your hands and your instruments (like a small plucker for instance).

5) Let the mix of distilled water, alcohol and sick material rest for a period of two hours up to two days. This is what is called in homeopathy a “mother tincture”. It is from this “mother tincture” that the homeopathic remedies are made after many dilutions.

Note : you can do the same process with an external substance that might have a negative effect on the body (poison, chemicals…). You just have to replace in the process the scratch of sick or infected material by a little piece of the outside substance that might be harmful (if it is a solid, you can crush it before).

 

B. DILUTIONS AND SUCCUSSIONS

For this you will need a small plastic or glass jar or flask (with a cap on it). This jar should be as clean as possible.

1) Mix a little bit of the mother tincture with pure distilled or filtered water until the jar is nearly full. This is the first dilution.

2) Shake vigorously the jar around thirty times. Open the cap and throw the content of the jar. Quickly turn upside the jar and you will see that one or two drops of the liquid will still be in the jar. This remaining liquid will be used for the second dilution.

3) Fill with pure distilled or filtered water the jar which still have a few drops of the previous mix in it. This is the second dilution.

4) Shake the jar thirty times, throw the content and quickly put the jar upside.

5) Add pure water nearly up to the top, this is the third dilution. Shake, empty the jar and keep the few remaining drops.

Notes : a) what is important in the process is the successive dilutions and succussions.

b) you can repeat this process 20, 30 or 200 times. The more dilutions you make, the more powerful the homeopathic remedy will be. Usually between 30 and 50 dilutions is a good number.

c) you should not make less than 20 dilutions (especially if the scratch of sick material is infectious or poisonous) to ensure that no remaining physical elements of the initial material is left.

 

C. CONSERVATION OF THE ISOTHERAPIC MEDICINE

After having completed the number of dilutions that you had programmed (for more details read homeopathic books about the notions of “dilution”or “potency”), rather than throwing the content of the jar, you keep half of the content of the jar and you fill up the jar with white alcohol (like vodka). You can keep this remedy safely two or three weeks if you have enough alcohol in it. When you want to use it, you just have to pour a few drops of the isotherapic medecine in a glass or a bottle of water.

Another solution is to keep only a few drops of the liquid after the last dilution and add two or three drops of white alcohol. After mixing, you just have to add special plain pellets (which have not received any homeopathic medicine on them : you can find them in a chemist’s shop). You will, with this method, have your isotherapic medicine on the form of pellets that you will use as a classic homeopathic remedy.

 

CONCLUSION

This isotherapic healing method can be interesting if you live far away from civilization (if doctors or remedies are not available, for example in case of humanitarian crisis. Homeopathic and isotherapic medicines can have very good results in serious epidemic outbreaks) or in case of disease difficult to cure with other methods. It can also be used as preventive medicine.

So, do not think that you will cure all the diseases and all the problems with this method, but I think that it can be worth trying, for small or big health problems, especially if other methods are not very efficient. I had some interesting healing results with this method for me and other persons. It can also be applied in the veterinary and phyto-sanitary fields.

Homeopathy

The principles of homeopathy are quite simple (compared to allopathic medicine which must be studied during long years) : if a mineral, vegetal or animal substance creates some particular symptoms on a healthy individual, then an infinitesimal amount of the same substance will cure the symptoms mentioned above on a sick individual.

Let’s see two examples of this principle :

a) The onion (allium cepa) usually makes an healthy person cry, have red eyes or even cough, sneeze… If you give a very tiny dose of the homeopathic remedy (allium cepa) to a sick person who has red eyes with tears (for example sinusitis, allergy…) then it will solve this particular range of symptoms.

b) In the same logic, the bee’s venom triggers in an healthy person a painful swelling that will be reduced by cold. Therefore a small amount of the homeopathic remedy made with bee’s venom (apis mellifica) will cure the pains linked to burns, conjonctivitis, some insects’ bites or whatever symptoms with the same characteristics (painful swelling that gets better with cold applications).

This kind of logic has been applied to more than 2000 animal, vegetal and mineral substances. The gradual effects of these 2000 substances (very often poisonous or toxic) on some volunteers have been precisely studied and described in what is called “materia medica”. Then you just have to define what are the symptoms of the sick person you want to cure and then search for the closest symptoms that you will find in the “materia medica”. After you have to give the corresponding homeopathic dilution to the sick person to cure the symptoms.

This is the theory. We can add that :

a) As a matter of fact, only 200 or 300 homeopathic substances are commonly used (the other ones are reserved to specialists or very particular uses).

b) We can also say that usually many homeopathic books have already made the work of research (comparison between the symptoms you want to cure and the corresponding substances in the “materia medica”) and propose some of the already known most efficient substances in relation with the most frequent diseases and ailments. This is a quicker and simpler way to find the correct homeopathic remedy for any particular condition.

c) We have to notice also that homeopathy do not treat a cold or a flu in itself, but a range of symptoms that can be very different from one person to another. In this case, allopathic medicine would give the same drug to all the patients affected by a common virus to try to kill the virus and therefore suppress the cause at the origin of the cold or of the flu. Homeopathic medicine would rather check what are the external effects triggered by the virus (or by other reasons : cold, exhaustion, allergy, immune weakness…), give the best homeopathic remedy in relation to this range of symptoms (via “materia medica”) and then the body will have a self-defence reaction (a little bit like a vaccine) that will protect him (for example by stimulating the immune system, by restoring balance in disrupted organs…).

Therefore homeopathic medecine does not search in priority the causes of the problem but tries to describe as precisely as possible all the emerging symptoms which can cause discomfort in one way or the other to the individual. When the homeopathic remedy is used then the body (or the soul, or the aura, we don’t know exactly how it works) deals itself with the causes, the imbalances, pains or abnormalities which affect it.

We can note also that homeopathy can deal with a wide range of symptoms and is not limited to “easy to cure” diseases. It can work as a preventive medecine or a curative one. Another advantage is the fact that homeopathy is rather cheap compared to some allopathic remedies. We can also say that homeopathic remedies have little side effects (maybe because they help the body to defend itself).

The main problem is to find the correct homeopathic substance that will deal with the symptoms you want to cure for yourself or others. Each homeopathic remedy acts like a specific key. The only mistake you can make is not to find the correct key. In this case nothing will really happen, and after some time you will have to try another homeopathic substance.

You cannot make big mistakes : or a positive healing happens or nothing happens. Usually the choice has to be made between two or three specific substances.  Therefore this healing method can be easily understood and practiced by individuals with only a limited medical background but cannot be used when the healing is needed urgently.

Note : this very brief presentation of homeopathy cannot replace the information you can find on a complete and serious homeopathic book (I can advise you the simple and well-written “a complete guide to homeopathy” by Alan V.Schmukler which also deals with the subject of isotherapy). The more you read about homeopathy the easier it is to find the correct “keys”.

Macro-economic implications of energy stabilization systems

Dear readers,

     I have just finished a very interesting text about the issues presented in the post “free energy and perpetual motion”. Unfortunately, this text is written in French (and, even more difficult, without any accents because I wrote it from an English QWERTY computer). Nevertheless, it is so interesting that I decided to include it in this blog, maybe you will find an automatic translator or someone to translate it for you.

     As soon as possible (within two or three months) I will try to translate it into English. If you did this work before me, you can send your translation to energienaturelle@yahoo.fr, I will then give it to all the readers.

     The main subject of this French text is to develop systems to stock electrical energy with ecological devices and to see what would be the consequences on the global energy flows. The objective is to reduce the use of nuclear and fossil energy.

    I also wanted to tell you that if you are fed up of your chemical toothpaste, you can add some good quality marine salt to a glass a water (until this water is like sea water) and then brush your teeth with this water. You will need a little bit of practice but salt is one of the best ecological toothpaste that exists. Next buddhameditation’posts will be about homeopathy and isotherapy. 

Note : finally, I decided to erase this text because it was a little bit too long. If you want to read the French version of this text, please send an E.mail to the above mentioned E.mail address, I will send it to you.

Free energy and perpetual motion

     The second idea comes from a theoretical  and organizational reflexion about energy :

It would be interesting to blend the researches about perpetual motion (diminution of resistances to movement, use of natural forces, use of technical devices, reflexion about entropy…) and the best ways to extract energy coming from natural sources.

     In fact researches about perpetual motion seem limited by the law of entropy. We can only (for the moment ?) get close to perpetual motion without really reaching it. Therefore if we connect the researches about perpetual motion (technical and intellectual researches) with the huge amount of power naturally present on Earth (solar energy, wind energy, water’s cycle, tidal energy, geothermal energy…) then we could practically have free perpetual motion on the global Earth’s ecosystem (because the law of entropy would not apply or only in limited proportions to the global Earth’s system).

If you have free perpetual motion you can produce free mechanical and electrical energy (rotor-motor electromagnetic systems).

Therefore the main objective on this subject would be :

1) to choose the more efficient energy producing systems coming from the perpetual motion researches (diminution of resistances…)

2) to find the best ways to extract energy from the natural free cycles (wind turbines, solar systems, hydraulic generators…)

3) to invent systems and infrastructures that would connect these two researches and give the best possible amount of available energy to humanity.

Therefore, if this idea works, humanity could have nearly free energy for generations and generations without using the most deadly nuclear energy.

     Another very interesting research on this topic would be to find ways to easily stock all this energy in simple, easy to build and repair, non-chemical systems (electricity is a very difficult to stock energy : it is always moving. We have to find ways to still this source of power).

You can link this post with the post “the worst marketing strategy” (filed in the January posts) : to build solid and efficient goods is also a way to reduce our global energetic wastes. You can also connect this post with the macro-economic reassessment of economic production, profit, necessary annual increase of production… : see the January posts (“critic of the western societies : we are going too fast”, “shift of paradigm”, “inventing a new philosophy”…).

Bi annual population transfer

     Before talking about homeopathy and isotherapy, I just would like to briefly present you some ideas that I recently had. May these ideas be beneficial to all beings.

The first one is a kind of global utopia, a way to invent some alternative models to the present-day economic and political systems. I had a kind of “vision” about a humanity which would try to follow as much as possible the natural cycles rather than trying to destroy them or protect from them (that is to say rather than considering them as enemies).

The main point was concerning a bi-annual population transfer between the hot and cold zones of the Earth, according to seasons. We all know that according to seasons and locations, the climate conditions can be very different. Some of these conditions are biotic, others are antibiotic. The most wonderful and hospitable place can be a real nightmare three months later.

The idea would be to create easy, ecological and affordable means of transport between these zones. We could imagine that the cities in the South during winter and the cities in the North and/or mountains in summer could become centers of high population via the construction of ecologically orientated buildings and infrastructures.

During the “antibiotic” seasons (high temperature in the plains, extreme cold in mountains or North regions…), only a small portion of the inhabitants would stay in these regions. Due to the reduced number of people, they will gather in the best possible places (well-insulated houses in cold climate, fresh and watered locations in hot climates) and they will be able to use sufficient amounts of energy to live in comfortable conditions. Their role will only be to maintain in proper order the infrastructures and buildings of the momentarily unoccupied zones.

     We can imagine that the departures from one zone to another can be done progressively, smoothly. A lot of opportunities, collective structures, ashrams, communities, farms, works… could be created on the routes between North and South.

We will have to find the best climatic and geographic locations to implement this idea. Mountains in hot seasons are for example huge and beautiful places with lot of water, sunshine, fresh air… The only thing is to respect them and the people who live there since generations.

We could imagine that this ecologically orientated model could have many consequences. For example:

1) diminution of the global energetic needs and consumption. It is easier to warm a house when it is 16 degrees outside than minus 2 degrees.

2) diminution of the global need for transport : paradoxically the huge bi-annual transfer of population would give two (or more) areas/regions/place of living to most people (except those who want to stay the whole year in one place) who will locally live an ecologically-orientated life, not in one place but in two (or more). Is it not the dream of most people to live in fresh mountains during hot summers and near warm beaches during cold seasons ? Essentially satisfied by their 6 months dual locations they will less feel the need to go by plane at 5000 km for two weeks holidays just to forget a cold winter or a hot summer.

3) I guess that this proposal could solve a lot of problems in the employment field. Autonomy would be promoted, global need for hard and underpaid works would diminish (increase in global cooperation between human beings).

     4) This idea would imply to redefine the notions of frontiers, economic zones, political blocks. It is sure that controls and security must stay but the frontiers’ systems and logics will have to be softened and adapted to allow this giant bi-annual transfer of population. This system could be applied within one country, an economic zone or a continent.

Finally the main question arising from this idea would be this one : what kind of architectural, political, economical, social, legislative, productive… systems can we imagine to implement in the best possible conditions this idea ?

Note : this post is an application of the ideas proposed in the post : ” transformation part III : towards enlightenment” (see the  June posts)

Notes concerning the previous posts

     After a few months, I found the time to read again all the posts that I wrote on this “buddhameditation.wordpress.com” blog and I would like to add just a few notes concerning some of the previous posts :

1) concerning the post “save the primitive forests’ (filed in the January’s posts) : I think that among our present-day economic and energetic crisis we should acknowledge the fact that trees transform solar energy into something that can easily be used by humans : wood and its derived products (without talking about all the other effects of trees on the global ecosystem).

We have to understand that a great deal of the energy present on Earth comes from the sun : solar energy in itself (light and heat) but also wind energy; water’s cycle (hydro energy); biomass; petrol; gaz; coal… I personally think that one of the main objective of this century will be to find ways to use this solar power in the best ecological way possible. Trees are therefore as important as wind turbines in the global energy production. If we want to have a good production of wood, we have to understand and protect trees and forests rather then wipe them out, that seems obvious.

2) concerning the post “from materialism to inner peace” (filed in the January’s posts) : I made a small mistake in this post. I wrote : “So two different kind of actions can be done if you want to please the individual : or you can change the reality… or you can change the link between the individual and the reality.”

A more precise statement would be that there are three ways to please the individual : a) change the external reality b) change the link between the individual and the reality c) change the individual (through philosophy, meditation, understanding, love, equanimity…).

I also wanted to give further explanations concerning the concept of Sat (Sanskrit term which is usually translated by “Self” in English) that you find at the end of the post. As it is said in the post, the concept of Sat comes from the old hindu philosophy and is rather difficult to translate. Sat is close to the concept of “God”, “ultimate metaphysical principle”.

     The Sat is everywhere and everything, each atom of our huge realities. But it also encompasses the difficult to comprehend parallel spiritual realities.

Sat in its pure form (that is to say in it pure ideal form, form which does not belong to our limited spheres full of duality and opposition) is : unity, clarity, infinity, light, point, sphere, pure consciousness, radiance, void, totality, ecstasy, bliss, unconditional love, perfect equanimity… When the individual consciousness merges with the Sat then it attains what is called liberation, nirvana, satori, enlightenment, spiritual bliss.

Spiritual experiences can be more or less strong but it is said in the Hindu philosophy that each time, the individual consciousness, during these experiences, discovers what he or she really is, the true reality, the very substance which constitutes us.

Note : a) obviously, if the Sat is everywhere and everything, we are part of the Sat and our human consciousness can miraculously discover and identify themselves with this huge spiritual power inside themselves via yoga and meditation b) we have to remember that these are only words and they cannot replace the true meditative experience that they try to describe.

3) concerning the post “vegetarianism” (filed in the January’s posts) : I think that the main point about this topic is the necessity to reduce, during their lives and at the moment of their death (with anesthesia for example), the amount of sufferings experienced by “animals”.

To make a distinction between animals and humans is to forget the fundamental closeness which links all beings on Earth. We have to live and protect ourselves but we should not harm unnecessarily other beings, who also have the gift of life, sensation, intelligence, feelings… the same remarks apply to scientific experiments made with “animals”.

4) concerning the post “materialism vs religion” (filed in the January’s posts) : at the end of this post a very short analysis of the dream phenomenon and its links to meditation and creative visualization is made. These three aspects have been qualified as  ”inner worlds”. I just want here to precise the similarities between them :

a) the inner worlds reached by dream, meditation and creative visualization happen when the eyes of the individual are closed.

b) the external senses are retracted, withdrawn from the external stimuli (even if an unconscious part of ourselves is still watching the outside world : loud noises, danger…)

c) in these states the individual has the feeling not to be anymore in contact with the outside material world but to be in presence of an inner reality which has no precise physical localisation.

d) very often images, sounds or other sensations happen.

e) colors are also there and other characteristics that you can find in our material worlds : other persons, landscapes, emotions, dialogues, interactions, stories, messages…

f) nevertheless, very often, the logic found in these inner worlds is different from our everyday physical reality : the inner logics or events are more fantastic, surrealistic or chaotic.

These common elements found in dream, meditation and creative visualization made me think that it was possible to logically compare them at the end of the post “materialism vs religion”

5) concerning the post “more ideas part. II” (filed in the June’s posts) : the legalization of the right to use psychotropic or psychedelic substances (under certain conditions, see the post) is maybe also a way to reduce the pace of our societies (see the post “critic of the western societies : we are going too fast” filed in the January’s posts). We should consider the intelligent use of certain substances (that we have to clearly define, understand and control) as a kind of past-time, nothing more. Penalization creates deadly substances, violent black market, anxiety, tensions, violence, overdoses, ecological damages…

We focus too much on our war against some substances and we do not try to understand what precisely humans look for by using these substances : joy, equanimity, freedom, disconnection from worries, enjoyment, escape, evasion, hope, quietness, clarity, strength, courage… These are the qualities that we have to search for, with or without external substances. This logic is far away from the feeling of general paranoia and violence created by an unjust war on so-called drugs.

6) The posts that I find especially important and that I advise you to read in priority, are : inventing a new philosophy (January files) / universal basic income (idem) / vegetarianism (idem) / materialism vs religion (idem) / everything exists (February files) / lessons and messages from the NDE worlds (May files) / some inventions that could change the world (June files) / transformation part.III : towards enlightenment (idem) / more ideas part. II (idem) / the ultimate metaphysical theory part. II (idem).

7) I want also to apologize for the sometimes politically orientated analysis that I made in some posts (see for instance “critics of the western societies : we are going too fast”, “one of the worst marketing strategy”, “shift of paradigm”… all filed in the January’s posts).

I think that objectivity is not to wipe out all subjectivity but to take into account that subjectivity. I will therefore give my view on this politically orientated posts so that you can take my personal bias into account.

I personally think that the Earth and its inhabitants are presently in danger and that a big part of the problems comes from human actions. Therefore I feel that criticism is something that our generation needs. I prefer criticism to revolution and violence. There are in the left, ecologist, anarchist, green anarchist… philosophies a lot of interesting analysis and critics of our societies.

I tried to blend some of these political, social and technological analysis with some spiritual themes (NDE, Buddhism, Hinduism, non-violence, Dharma, karma, illumination, meditation…) to see if we could reduce the global violence generated by our systems.

To make critics, to propose alternative solutions, is an important characteristics of any healthy society. We just have to hope that our political and financial leaders will be able to transform themselves and create a more sustainable system than the one we presently live in. To formulate critics is a part of this movement of self-improvement that each of us, as individual, can do.

I just hope that my posts will be beneficial to other beings and that we will all together reduce our global violence. In the next posts I will write some ideas about isotherapy and homeopathy (see the post “more ideas part.II” in the June’s file). I will also try later to present some books’ excerpts about philosophy, meditation, self-transformation…

Final conclusion

     Note : if you want to have an easy access to this blog, the best way is to go to the google search engine and write “buddhameditation.wordpress.com”.

     I have a lot of things to do in the next months, and I will not be able to write before a while. So let’s put an end to our philosophical investigation.

FINAL CONCLUSION

     These writings do not pretend to be demonstrations or truths. A true demonstration is difficult in philosophy, because philosophy deals with language and words which are full of history, meanings, emotions, memories, interactions with other words. For instance, if you want to define a word, like in a dictionary, you will have to use other words. These other words will also have to be defined. You will quickly realise that to define precisely any word of the dictionary, you will nearly have to define all the other words.

    Therefore, the very foundation of philosophy are highly complex, full of delicate interactions. Exactly like in the scientific field, philosophy can only create progressive approximations of what could be “the truth”.

     Thus, we cannot prove that highly negative actions lead to hell or that the substance found in dreams or inner worlds is identical to the substance creating our physical reality (see the former posts). Nevertheless, we can gather a whole range of facts, thoughts, knowledge organizations and ancient or modern experiences that make us think that the truth is probably here.

    How could we define “truth” ? Truth in the case of “life after death” (as we could call it, or “life after life”) is what will happen to each of us after physical death, whatever may be our ideas or convictions about it. In this case, this could be called “truth”.

    Some say that there is nothing after death, that it is just the extinction of the individual consciousness. I prefer to follow the opinions and teachings of the persons considered to be the greatest mystics and meditators of all times (Moses, Jesus, Mahomet, Buddha Shakyamuni, hindu yogi, buddhist masters…). These persons knew the inner worlds and travelled in these inner dimensions closely related to the Near Death Experiment (NDE) worlds. To say that there is nothing after death, just a black veil, appears to me like a lack of knowledge and inner experiences, an easy way to solve the question without being sure  about anything.

    In the modern scientific field, there is a principle called “the precaution principle”. In my opinion what is called “life after death” and “karma and Dharma laws” have a really high probability of existence (99.9% or more I would reckon). Therefore, it is my duty as a philosopher, spiritual seeker and meditator to warn all human beings : people who consciously and unnecessarily create sufferings in thousands or even millions of human and animal beings will certainly suffer the worst nightmares during huge amounts of time after their physical death. They will endure much more pain than the amount of pain or suffering they have created in other beings. All this seems obvious to me because we are fundamentally spiritual beings and our main goal is to go towards Dharma (see the former posts) not to block other beings or make them suffer unnecessarily for egoistic reasons.

     But maybe I am wrong. Only what is called “direct inner experience” (inner experiences, very precise and clear, that cannot leave a single doubt about their truthfulness and universality) can give an absolute certainty about such a knowledge. Very few human beings throughout history have attained such a fullness and clarity of knowledge. These persons are called Buddha, Enlightened Ones (“Budha” as a matter of fact means “the Enlightened One” in Sanskrit). Buddhas, according to many spiritual traditions, have been many in the past and I sincerely hope that many more of them will come in the future.

     Buddhas are real human beings who go beyond the usual boundaries of humanity and become spiritual guides. Due to their intense spiritual training or to some kind of gift from birth, they are far above any intellectual geniuses, they enter consciously and at will in the spiritual dimensions and gather knowledge or experiences far beyond any ordinary knowledge (no need for drugs, smart drugs or modern technology for this. For example yoga and love are enough). One of the main teaching of Buddha Sakyamuni is that all human beings have the possibility to reach Nirvana, Enlightenment.

     I am not a Buddha and even if I am far from this enlightened state, my personal meditative experiences without the use of any psychedelic substances make me understand that such high spiritual states are without any doubt possible.

     Personally, my work is merely philosophical and rational : I say, there is this fact, this old theory, this new experience… and from all this I tried to build a coherent hypothesis that could be a correct approximation of what could happen after physical death. From this approximation I issued a warning, exactly as a scientist or a doctor would do : be careful, if you do a lot of unneccessary destructive or negative actions you may face a terrible nightmare and endure much more pain than the amount of pain and sufferings that you have created in other beings.

    So my advice would be : do not create unnecessary negative or destructive actions. Even if in the past you generated a lot of negative actions, follow the Bodhisattva Vow (a Buddhist moral concept and practice) and you will at least attenuate or solve much of your future sufferings. Take the firm resolution to do good actions, to help others, to alleviate the sufferings of others, not to kill or harm unnecessarily other beings.

     Finally, I advise you to slowly read from the beginning the posts of this blog (because there is a logical progression in them). If you have any questions, remarks or comments, please write them at the end of each post. I will do my best to answer them. Please do excuse me for the many english mistakes that you will find here and there (English is not my native language).

     I express my gratitude to all the Buddhas, Bodhisattvas and spiritual guides connected to the Earth’s reality. May they guide us and protect us during generations and generations. May these writings be beneficial to all sentient beings.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1)Buddha Sakyamuni : – academic translation of his sutras

- academic translation of the Therigata and Theragata poems

2) academic translations of Lie tse and Lao tse

3) Patanjali yoga sutra. Translation Shyam Ranganathan. Ed : penguin classics.

4) academic translation of the Tibetan book of the dead.

5) Pure Lands buddhist schools : – academic translations of Amitabh sutra (Sanskrit) and Amida sutra (Japan).

- Honen : senchaku- shu

6) Shabkar : food of Bodhisattva. Buddhist teachings on abstaining from meat. Ed : Shechen publication.

7) Ma Anandamayi ma : the essential Sri Anandamayi Ma by Anandamayi ma and Joseph A.Fitzgerald.

8.) Ramana Maharsi : the spiritual teachings of Ramana Maharsi. Ed : Shambala editions.

9) Mircea Eliade : Yoga, immortality and freedom.

10) Peter Harvey : an introduction to Buddhism, teachings, history and practices.

11) Reiki : – Walter Lubeck and Mark Osak : the big book of reiki symbols.

- William Lee Rand : reiki for a new millenium.

- William Lee Rand, Frank Arjava Petter and Walter Lubeck : the spirit of reiki.

The ultimate metaphysical theory part. II

     From this result, two solutions arise :

1) or the atomic theory is true, so the Barjavel’s result will be true and it will show that our everyday physical reality is essentially non-material (this result will therefore be very close to hinduist and buddhist theories formulated more than 2000 years ago).

2) or the atomic theory is false and it would prove once again that our sciences are nothing but a succession of trials and errors. Scientific truths are only successive approximations. Furthermore, the modern alternative theories seem even more crazy than the atomic theory : quantic model, equivalence of matter and energy, spins and quarks…

Facing so much doubts and contradictions, we will therefore propose a metaphysical theory that could solve all these problems. Let’s begin :

 a) the difference between material world and spiritual world is just a model, a theory, a tool. It does not describe (or only imperfectly) what reality or truth are.

b) on a metaphysical point of view, all is existent : our physical reality, the world of dreams, inner worlds (meditation, imagination, memory…), the NDE worlds… ( see the post : “everything exists”).

c) we are in presence of a whole range of existent realities, each one with special rules and organizations. For example, the world of dreams has special laws, possibilities, constraints and logics. Our physical reality also.

    From this point, how could we define the main characteristics of our physical realities ?

a) existence of laws : gravitation, interaction of various forces, action/reaction, cause/effect… (this is the main subject of sciences)

b) material/external/collective realities and spiritual/internal/individual realities both are existent and are interconnected. The material side can affect the spiritual side and vice versa.

c) “paranormal” or “irrational” facts do exist also (millions of facts could prove that, read the former posts of this blog).

     Therefore, a “rational platform” does exist in our physical reality (that is why sciences find some “universal” laws). But in the outskirts of this “rational platform”, some irrational or paranormal phenomenon do also exist. This logic is very close to the relation between Newton’s and Einstein’s theories. At an ordinary level, the Newton’s laws are exact and sufficient, but if you come to extreme conditions (high gravitation forces or high speed), then you have to shift to Einstein’s equations if you want a precise result. On normal conditions, Einstein’s equations are equal to Newton’s formulas.

     We can conclude that our physical reality, that the scientists try to describe in a rational/logic way, does not seem as “solid” or “stable” as we think (what about the gravitation laws if only one example of spiritual levitation or telekinesis can be proven ?).

     To sump-up : a) the material substance of our reality is essentially composed of empty space/void/emptiness and/or energy/waves/subtle matter (see Barjavel and the nuclear physicists).

b) our physical reality is rational in some parts of it and irrational in some other parts.

c) the physical reality can be transformed by our minds (magics/spiritual powers).

     You can notice that in the three last points, “physical reality” could be replaced by “dream”, “NDE worlds”, “inner worlds” without making big mistakes. Therefore, we can postulate (for more explanation about what is a postulate, see the post “general conclusion”) that at a metaphysical/ontological level, the substance at the base/root of dreams, NDE worlds, inner worlds and our physical reality is not different. Only the rules organizing these different realities change. If we accept the postulate, we can therefore say that dream is a reality and that reality is like a dream.

     Said in other words :

1) we live in a spiritual reality not different in its essence from the world of dream, astral travel or NDE.

2) our inner worlds (spiritual) and outer worlds (material/physical) are linked, connected, interrelated.

3) rationality/logic/coherence/laws are only a part of our realities. The other part is irrational, unknown, possibility, freedom.

4) We are facing a whole range of possibilities and choices. Magic, spiritual powers and irrational/paranormal phenomenon are a part of these possibilities.

    So in front of this network of possibilities, of this open future, we can connect with the ancient moral theory of karma and Dharma (moral and spiritual laws based on a system of action/reaction and aiming at the ideal of complete liberation and nirvana).

    We have to find the ways/paths/actions that can lead us towards Dharma (love, peace, harmony, stability, inner and outer liberation) (see the post : ” karma and Dharma”) and avoid the actions that lead us towards adharma (suffering, wars, violence, destructions, pollutions…). We have to collectively change for the best our actions, speeches and thoughts.

     We also have to acknowledge the fact that the spiritual dimensions after physical life (NDE, tibetan bardo, paradise and hell) may be as existent as our physical realities and the world of dreams. All these spiritual dimensions may be organized according to the karma and Dharma laws. Furthermore, the very knowledge of these spiritual laws may come from ancient and deep inner experiences made by humans in prehistoric times (before writing arrived).

    Finally, our ultimate metaphysical theory includes : 1) the scientific rational laws 2) the irrational/paranormal phenomenon that maybe in the future we will integrate in our rational/logical/coherent knowledge but maybe not : irrationality is maybe a genuine part of our realities. For example, are the telepathic connections between all human beings rationally organized, or are they so complex that unpredictable chaotic phenomenon arise ? It is maybe the unpredictability arising from the nearly infinite number of elements interrelated that will ultimately create freedom. The gods and other spiritual beings may exist and judge our actions according to karma and Dharma laws but they maybe don’t have any control over the totality of possibilities arising from our complex multidimensional Universe. Personally, I do not believe in an already fixed destiny nor that the existence is a cycle of repetitive/identical existences. I think that the unidirectional arrow of Time is a core-characteristic of our physical realities and that we are in a process of positive evolution, unless total destruction arise.

    Note : magic is only one of the many possibilities of our realities. This is maybe not the best or easiest way to transform our world towards a better future because we collectively don’t know so much how to handle these spiritual powers. Maybe in the future this will be possible but for the moment it seems better to live a normal life and to focus our minds on the high moral ideal of Dharma/liberation/spiritual bliss (see the posts “karma and dharma” and “the moral issue”). In the hinduist and buddhist philosophies it is said that the spiritual seekers should not focus on mental or spiritual powers. It is better to focus on inner liberation and become emotionally detached from powers that could arise, especially if these powers reinforce the ego, the desires or can harm other beings. If these powers arise during the spiritual quest, so let them be if they are positive, but it is a mistake to focus exclusively on them.

The ultimate metaphysical theory part. I

     Before reaching the conclusion of this blog, I will try to sum-up a metaphysical theory that could integrate all the so-called “paranormal” phenomenon into a coherent explanation. I worked on this subject a few years ago. It is quite difficult, so fasten your seat belts…

    The basis of this theory comes from a book called “la faim du tigre” written by Barjavel, a French philosopher. We all know that according to the atomic theory, all atoms are made of a nucleus (protons+neutrons) and electrons around them. Between these electrons and the nucleus is void/emptiness/empty space. All human beings are made of atoms. According to Barjavel, if we gather all human beings on earth, and we put aside all the void of their atoms ( i.e, if we keep only the material parts of the atoms : nucleus and electrons), so all the material components of the humanity would fit in a thimble.

    Therefore, if we keep only what we consider as material in all human beings, and set aside what is considered to be nothing (the void between the nucleus and the electrons), what is left would be no bigger than two or three peas. A thimble of material substance is enough to create 5 billions humans and all their dreams, the complexity of their hands and eyes, the delicate interactions of their hormones…

     This is a very surprising result so I decided to verify it by myself. I just give you a quick sum-up if you want to do it also.

     Human beings are made of 65%oxygen, 18.5% carbon, 9.5% hydrogen, 3.2% nitrogen, 1.5% calcium, 1% phosphorus, 0.4% potassium, 0.3% sulphur, 0.2%sodium, 0.2% chlorine, 0.1% magnesium and 1% of trace elements (zinc, gold, iron…). If we consider a medium weight of 70 kg per capita and a total of 6 billions human beings, we can reach an approximation of the mass of each atomic element for all the inhabitants of the planet.

     The next step is a little more complex and uses the Avogadro number and the nuclear mass of each atomic element. We know (for more details look at “Avogadro number” in a physics book) that there is 6.022*(10*23) atoms in 12 grams of carbon, 6.022*(10*23) atoms in 16 grams of oxygen and the same amount in 40 grams of calcium.

     So from this, if we know the number of grams of every atomic elements contained in the whole humanity, we can easily deduct the number of atoms of each elements contained in the humanity.

     After this we have to know that the radius of the nucleus of an atom is approximately a hundred thousand times smaller than the radius of the atom (by the way, this data shows that the atom is mainly made of empty space. If you imagine that the nucleus of an atom is big as an orange with a radius of 5 centimeters, the outside borders of the atom will be at 5 kilometers). The radius of the oxygen atom is estimated at 60*(10*-12) meters, the radius of the carbon atom is 70*(10*-12)meters… All in all, the radius of all the atomic elements found in the human body are between [60 and 220] *(10*-12) meters.

     So the experts in mathematics will easily find from the previous data : 1) the estimation of the radius of the nucleus of every atom 2) if R is the radius of the nucleus, 4*pi*(R*3)/3 is the volume of the nucleus. So the volume of each nucleus will be between [9 and 450]*(10*-46) cubic meter. Then you will have to multiply these volumes by the total number of atoms found at the beginning of the demonstration.

     We all know that the atom is made of a nucleus, empty space and electrons. I did not find precise data about the size of the electrons (the only data I found is that the mass of a proton is about 2000 times superior to the mass of the electrons and that the numbers of electrons cannot be superior to the number of protons. But this does not give us any detail about the size of electrons, so I prefered to neglect their volume). If you find some information about electrons, then you will have more precise approximations than mine.

All in all, I found a result very close to Barjavel’s result (a little bit smaller).

More ideas part. II

    ] Note : if you are interested by new ecological devices, please read the post “some inventions that could change the world”. You will find information about a) wind turbines that produce water b) how to stock easily vast amounts of electrical energy c) how to run a car with compressed air… and more [

1) Sharing of knowledge and know-how is important. Example : some countries are presently technologically less advanced than the western countries and face great difficulties. Let’s help them to live in a peaceful and ecological way. Simplicity, durability, easy to repair, affordable, strong and efficient should be the main objectives of any technical devices created.

     Another example lies in the millions of scientific experiments that are not yet analysed. We should try to organise our knowledge and to promote cooperation and cross-overs among scientists, philosophers, historians, technicians… to attain a stable knowledge rather than promoting new very costly and sometimes totally useless experiences (see for example the huge amount of money spent in the CERN in Geneva. What for ? To create a new source of energy even deadlier than nuclear energy ? To create experimentally an unpredictable big bang that would annihilate all of us ?).

     Of course, when I talk about sharing one’s knowledge in a positive way, I do not include the knowledge about highly polluting chemical substances or weapons of mass destruction. Persons who want to destroy the world, life or human beings, persons who make other beings suffer consciously and unnecessarily will go to “hell” and experience the worst possible experiences after death, unless their soul might be annihilated.

    In my humble opinion, “hell” is existent as paradise-like worlds are existent. When you read the Buddhist, Christian, Jewish, Muslim or Celt descriptions of the multiple hellish regions, you come to the conclusion that 10 or 20 years in jail would not match with one second in “hell”. I cannot see a more awful sin than destroying every life and possibility on earth. To participate in such anti-”sharing of positive knowledge” activities would mean hundreds or even thousands of years in hell. All this is just a waste of time and energy when you realise that a normal life and a few positive actions could lead us towards Paradise (see the post : “message from the NDE worlds”). The problem of our modern materialistic philosophies is to think that such experiences as “hell” or “Paradise” are non-existent.

2) We should try to better the way we collect rain waters (especially in the areas where the underground waters are highly polluted because of industries or farming). Tanks and small dams depending on the natural/geographic conditions of the area should be used for crops. Rain waters could be collected in individual houses and stored underground (see, for example, the old system of “trullo” in the dry areas of South Italy).

     We should also conduct surveys about the best ways to filter, mineralize and vitalize water (rain waters or filtered waters are often too pure, they lack minerals). When this will be done, let’s hope that big companies will provide high quality versions (long-lasting, inexpensive, strong, adapted to every situations…) of these simple and safe filter systems.

3) Some interesting new devices to control the mosquito population have appeared here and there (see for example : kinetr.com; mozzquit; sketterbag.com…). The concept of “ahimsa” in Hindu philosophy (usually translated by “non-violence”) must not make us forget the necessity to be protected from dangerous animals (mosquitoes are supposed to be the deadliest animals for mankind). In fact “ahimsa”, rather than “non-violence”, would be better translated by “non-hatred” (himsa=hatred, a=negation). So rather than trying to kill all the mosquitoes on earth (for example with DTT and huge pollutions), we should find ways to be locally protected.

    This kind of logic is also used in organic farming. Killing pest is only used locally and occasionally to restore a balance and generally speaking the organic farmers try to preserve as far as possible the delicate ecosystems and their highly subtle interactions. The “dream” of an insect-free agriculture does not work (see for example, and there are millions of such examples across the world, the huge problems faced by the almond producers in California. Too much pesticides have killed all surrounding bees and insects and now they have to artificially “import” bees to produce almonds).

     We have to accept the fact that some food will be lost due to the pests (usually 10 to 20 % in organic farming) rather than spraying huge amounts of pesticides that will pollute our waters and bodies (I don’t even talk about the madness of GMO). These non-perfect fruits or vegetables can anyway be used to fertilize (compost process) the next crops. It is better to protect the interactions between beings that took millions of year to settle rather than killing everything indiscriminately.

     Generally speaking, we have to accept the fact that our earth’s reality is difficult, that we can improve some external things and that other problems will never be solved. The solution is therefore to transform our inner relation to the world (see the post : “from materialism to inner peace”). One positive attitude found in reiki and other spiritual practices is : we have to accept the things that we cannot change and improve the things that we can change.

4) researches about rice dry cultivation could diminish the amount of water used and the quantity of methane released in the atmosphere.

5) So much food is lost during the stocking processes, especially in “underdeveloped” countries. Let’s solve this problem.

    This point is one example of the multiple energetic losses that we have to solve. We already talked about the madness of the war and competition system. Another example is the meat and dairy industries : approximately half the cereals produced on earth are used to feed the cattle (!!!). An estimated 60 billions (!!!) animals are killed every year (!!!) to feed humans and their pets (see the post : “vegetarianism”).

6) We should globally reduce our use of chemistry and nuclear energy. All our atomic manipulations (genetic, chemical, nuclear…) should be considered as dangerous unless they have proven to be safe on the long-term. We should really make further studies on the social and ecological impacts of these new sciences (300 or 400 years) and go for more sustainable materials (example : plastic bags made of corn starch). We should return to more natural ways of living, a blend of simplicity and highly intelligent technic. For this we have to reduce the pace of our crazy societies and really settle on earth in a harmonious way (rather than destroying it).

7) Isotherapy is a healing method derived from homeopathy. You can easily practice it yourself. It gives interesting results.

8.) Work is an absolute necessity. Presently, we work too much in a wrong direction. So we have to stop this movement and redirect our energies towards higher goals, socially and individually. Please check the notions of “karma yoga” in Hinduism and “do” in Japan.

9) We should analyse the strategies and psychological tricks used in advertising and marketing : how these sectors use our basic instincts and desires to make us consume ? What strategies do they use to make us forget our real goal (spiritual liberation) and feed the top of the hierarchy (see the post : “shift of paradigm”) ? Individualism; ego-feeding desires; fear of death, pain or loss…

     We should in particular investigate the excessive focus on the sexual pleasure and desire. When you look at the sexual desire with a cool mind, you will realise that these sexual desires, urges and games are strong, blinding, ask a lot of energy and all in all the pleasure coming out of all this is very small and quickly disappears. So this natural desire is used to blind us and make us forget that much higher joys and pleasures are available for free inside each individual (meditation, inner work, transformation of the link between the individual and its environment… see the post : “from materialism to inner peace”)

9) More globally, we should survey the worldwide strategies, ideologies and bias of the “world masters”, these persons who rule the world without any democratic control (political, economical, industrial leaders and decision makers). See the site http://www.syti.net/

10)Many spiritual traditions contest the use of drugs and I agree with them : if you want clarity of mind, stability and true spiritual ecstasy, it is better not to use these substances, the least the better. But the fact is that a huge number of persons use drug. The drug prohibition system (as during the prohibition of alcohol in the United States in the 1930′s) creates many problems : increased consumption (attraction towards what is forbidden); adulterated substances; black market; violent mafia organizations; loss of revenue for the States; expenses for judges, police and prisons…

     So in my opinion, we should acknowledge the fact that psychedelic substances (i.e “drugs”) have been used since long times by humans and that to use or not to use these substances should be left to the appreciation/responsibility of each individual. It seems to be a fundamental right, exactly in the same way that tobacco and alcohol are presently allowed (fine for use while driving, clear information about the risks and effects, minimum age to be allowed to use these substances…).

     From these point, We should depenalize/decriminalize and/or nationalize some of these substances (the less dangerous). A whole collective debate should be held on this subject. States and so-called mafia should work together. The war on drugs is another war, another scapegoat reflex (see the post : “critics of the western societies : we are going too fast”).

11) Each individual on earth should be able to easily control the number of children he or she can have. More researches on contraceptive methods, cheap, easy to use and adapted to every situations should be conducted. I do not agree at all with the former pope John Paul II on this subject. The aim is not so much to reduce the world population (with a strong ecological education and consciousness we could be 4 times more on earth) but to avoid giving birth to 6 children when food, water or money are scarce.

12) Prophylactic methods and hygiene should be organised in a simple way. All people on earth should learn and understand basic hygiene rules like washing hands before eating and cooking, to bury faeces underground when going to toilet outside, to collect rubbish… A few simple and non-invasive techniques could really improve the global hygiene.